Dan Sugalski wrote: > If you want efficiency, n-dimensional arrays really need to be a concrete > data type all of their own. That way one big block of memory can be > allocated and, if it's a typed array, properly sized. I wholeheartedly agree ;) > > That doesn't mean that n-dimensional arrays won't be just sugar over the > standard list-o-list structure to start, but they won't have to stay that way. That seems to be a possible route. Get multi-dim syntax for arrays but don't assume that they are list-of-list(refs). That way the implementation can be tuned as required. Christian
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Nathan Torkington
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) c . soeller
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) c . soeller
- multidim. containers David L. Nicol
- Re: multidim. containers Jeremy Howard
- Re: multidim. containers Dan Sugalski
- Re: multidim. containers John Porter
- Re: multidim. containers Christian Soeller
- Re: multidim. containers Dan Sugalski
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Tom Christiansen
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Nathan Torkington
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Tom Christiansen
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) c . soeller