At 04:30 PM 8/24/00 -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote: > >I'm coming into this a bit late, so forgive me if this is impossible or > >already dismissed, but what about > > > print <<qr/\s*FOO\s*/ > > Attention, dropsied weasel, we are > > launching our team of legal beagles > > straight for your scrofulous crotch. > > > xx oo > > FOO > >Rather than > > print <<FOO =~ /^\s+(.*\n)/g; > Attention, dropsied weasel, we are > launching our team of legal beagles > straight for your scrofulous crotch. > > xx oo > FOO > >you mean? Right; I was proposing new syntax for recognizing the terminator; it would not have any effect on the intervening text. -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies
- Re: RFC 111 (v1) Whitespace and Here Docs Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 111 (v1) Whitespace and Here Docs Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 111 (v1) Whitespace and Here Docs Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 111 (v1) Whitespace and Here Docs Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 111 (v1) Whitespace and Here Docs Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 111 (v1) Whitespace and Here Docs H.Merijn Brand
- Re: RFC 111 (v1) Whitespace and Here Docs Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 111 (v1) Whitespace and Here Docs Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 111 (v1) Whitespace and Here Docs Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 111 (v1) Whitespace and Here Docs Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 111 (v1) Whitespace and Here Docs Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 111 (v1) Whitespace and Here Docs Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 111 (v1) Whitespace and Here Do... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 111 (v1) Whitespace and Here Docs Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 111 (v1) Whitespace and Here Docs Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 111 (v1) Whitespace and Here Docs Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 111 (v1) Whitespace and Here Do... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 111 (v1) Whitespace and He... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 111 (v1) Whitespace and Here Docs Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 111 (v1) Whitespace and Here Docs Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 111 (v1) Whitespace and Here Docs Nathan Wiger