Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matches, even with ?? and // as delimiters.

[Nathan Torkington]

Stephen P. Potter writes:
> Great idea.  I'd love to see us come up with some "meta" RFCs which say
> what the main goals of perl6 are.  Then we could align the current RFCs
> with those meta RFCs to make sure we're meeting those goals.

Highly unlikely to happen, as we have lots of people with different
goals for perl6.  Larry might not pick one group of people and exclude
the others, so it'd be premature for us to do so.

I've RFCed making m mandatory on matches, which would remove some
of the current tokenizing confusion.  I'm open to others.

Nat