David Corbin wrote:
> >
> > For the remainder of the enclosing block, the barewords var,
> > array and hash are to be interpreted as references to a scalar, an
> > array, and a hash.
> 
> I'm confused by this statement.  Are you suggesting an alternative to
> the original RFC?  

No, I was trying to figure out what it meant in terms of implementation.

-- 
                          David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
       My argument is the result of selectively breeding straw men

Reply via email to