Dan Sugalski writes: > Personally I think I'm in favor of Nat's suggestion of allowing the > definition of new infix operators and let this be taken care of in a > module, but that's just passing the buck. (Not that it's a bad strategy, > mind... :) Solve the generic problem, not a specific one. I want to compare case-insensitively" is a specific problem and it's idiocy to go down the road of a special syntax for everyone's different specific problem. Nat
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp opera... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp opera... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp o... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and c... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq ... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operators Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operators Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp opera... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp o... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and c... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operators Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp opera... Glenn Linderman
- infix functions David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operators Markus Peter
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp opera... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp opera... John Porter
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operators Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operators Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operators John Porter