Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > Still not good. "trans" is too overloaded word. "transaction"? > "transactional"? (a bit too long...) "atomic"? "acid"? http://www.cs.duke.edu/education/courses/cps212/fall98/slides-html/recover/tsld002.htm http://www.byte.com/art/9504/sec11/art3.htm#fouracid There are probably better references out there; these are the first few that I found. -- John Porter
- RFC 130 (v4) Transaction-enabled variables for Perl6 Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transaction-enabled variables fo... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transaction-enabled variable... John Porter
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transaction-enabled vari... dLux
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transaction-enabled ... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transaction-ena... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transaction... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transaction-ena... John Porter
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transaction-ena... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transaction... Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transac... John Porter
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transac... dLux
- Re: RFC 130 (v4) Transac... John Porter