RE: Exception stack: let's use the @@ list.

[Brust, Corwin]

<snip>
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Olekshy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 6:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Exception stack: let's use the @@ list.

That's well and good, but the source code syntax says it's a block,
not a sub.  Am I supposed to spend the rest of my life asking myself,
"Wait, is this one of Corwin's special blocks?" ;-)

I think we should leave @_ alone.  @@ is free and it's the perfect
dual of $@.  What more could we ask for?

</snip>

Ok, uncle.

I think C<throw> was already going to operate on $@ by default, what about
C<warn>?

-Corwin