iain truskett said: > Well, personally I was busy with work and uni. Still am, but less > so. My chide was only meant nicely. Of course everyone's experience and insight is a needed contribution to the discussion. > I'd say that no RFC should be frozen until the deadline for all RFCs. > People can come up with the strangest insights given sufficient time > with ideas just churning in their mind. I suspect we all agree with you really, however setting a short deadline is a good trick for setting a fire under a discussion to get it going. I personally would welcome some further refinements on the RFC though, since (as you might be able to tell) I'm not totally satisfied with how it ended up. --Michael
- Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? iain truskett
- Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? Dave Storrs
- Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? Michael Mathews
- Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? iain truskett
- Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? Michael Mathews
- Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? Johan Vromans
- Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? iain truskett
- Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? Johan Vromans
- Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? iain truskett
- Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? Michael Mathews
- Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? Michael Mathews
- Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? Damien Neil
- Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? iain truskett
- Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? Damien Neil
- Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? Johan Vromans
- Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? Michael Mathews
- Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? David L. Nicol
- Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? Dave Storrs