At 08:19 AM 8/20/00 +0100, Graham Barr wrote: >Yes. I thought someone else would have done an RFC for this by >now, but I was going to propose that a for loop can >have any number of variables > > for my($a,$b,$c) (@array) { ... } > >steps three at a time, > > for my($key,$val) = (%hash) { ... } I would so love to have this. -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter i... Christopher J. Madsen
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit coun... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit ... Christopher J. Madsen
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit coun... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit ... Mike Pastore
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit ... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit ... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit ... Buddha Buck
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for statem... Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for st... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in fo... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for statements,... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for statements,... Steve Simmons
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for statem... John McNamara
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for st... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in fo... John McNamara
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for st... Steve Simmons
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for st... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in fo... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter i... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit coun... Jonathan Scott Duff