Nathan Torkington wrote: > John Porter writes: > > I really don't feel that strongly about it! > > If you think something is good, then argue for it. If you don't, don't. I *do* think it's good. I'm arguing for it because it's something I'd like to see happen. But I'm not passionate about it. If it turns out not to happen, I'm not going to pack up my marbles and go home. And I'm not going to keep arguing about it endlessly. This was kind of my way of saying, "this was fun, let's talk about something else for a while." Sorry. -- John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) wit... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying c... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... Stephen P. Potter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (string... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (string... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma... John Porter
- Devils advocacy (Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace =>... Nathan Torkington
- Re: Devils advocacy (Re: RFC 84 (v1) Repl... John Porter
- Re: Devils advocacy (Re: RFC 84 (v1) ... iain truskett
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying c... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (string... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (s... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying c... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma... John Porter