"Brust, Corwin" wrote:
>
> Peter Scott wrote:
> >
> > I think it would be best to supply a reference. This is a
> > mammoth RFC already and it will be decided on by people who
> > very well know what exception handling is; their reading time
> > is at a premium.
>
> Decided on, yes, but having the extra verbage in there helps
> folk like keep up.
>
> Perlhaps Tony would be willing to srip it down abit when the
> time comes to freeze it.
RFC 88 v2 is still getting bigger ;-) However, it is starting to
stabilize. I'll publish v2 in the next day or two, and then go
off and attempt to focus the presentation of the RFC 88 ideas for
a (hopefully) final v3.
I do want to leave in enough justification for the choices made,
so that the people who very well know will also know what details
we have already considered.
Yours, &c, Tony Olekshy
