On the main perl6-language list, Larry Wall wrote: > The main downside of accessors is that you can't (currently) say > > local $obj->attribute = 2; Oooh. Someone proposed this as a reason why we can't get rid of dynamic variables, and I've spent all evening being troubled by it. If that "currently" implies someone's thinking about this as a feature, maybe we really could do what I've been saying. Still chewing on various thoughts, J. David
- RFC 126 (v1) Ensuring Perl's object-oriented future Perl6 RFC Librarian
- READ THIS: Take it to -objects! (was Re: RFC 126 ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 126 (v1) Ensuring Perl's object-oriented ... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 126 (v1) Ensuring Perl's object-orien... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 126 (v1) Ensuring Perl's object-oriented... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 126 (v1) Ensuring Perl's object-orien... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 126 (v1) Ensuring Perl's object-oriented ... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 126 (v1) Ensuring Perl's object-orien... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 126 (v1) Ensuring Perl's object-o... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 126 (v1) Ensuring Perl's object-oriented ... J. David Blackstone
- Re: RFC 126 (v1) Ensuring Perl's object-oriented ... J. David Blackstone
- Re: RFC 126 (v1) Ensuring Perl's object-orien... Chaim Frenkel