Dave Storrs wrote: > The following words could also be overloaded for this purpose: > map, use I think I like use %record{ is a macro that expands to {my \%_ = \%record; even better than the same thing without the key word. Although $_{fieldname} is too long. If only all the punctuation weren't taken already! How about backslash, after the type-qualifier? use %record{ $\interest_earned += $\balance * $\rate_daily; }; Heavy OO could use \ the way C/Java/VB use . and only need one $ prefix.
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default ... Dave Storrs
- implied pascal-like "with" or "express&... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "... Jeremy Howard
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or &... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: implied pascal-like "with&qu... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like "with&qu... Dave Storrs
- Re: implied pascal-like "wi... Brian Wheeler
- Re: implied pascal-like "wi... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: implied pascal-like "wi... Dave Storrs
- Re: implied pascal-like "wi... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like "wi... Ken Fox
- Re: implied pascal-like "wi... Jeremy Howard
- Re: implied pascal-like "wi... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like "wi... Ken Fox
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" ... Damian Conway
- Re: implied pascal-like "with&qu... Jeremy Howard
- Re: implied pascal-like "with&qu... Damian Conway
- Re: implied pascal-like "with&qu... James Mastros
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or &... Damian Conway
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" ... Johan Vromans