> > Besides, context can't always tell: > > > > bar ( foo ); > > > > Should foo return a copy or an alias? > > want() obviously needs an additional parameter: how deep to go > back in the call stack. Which begs also for a way to find out how > deep is the call stack. That wouldn't help in this case, since it's a matter of whether the programmer intended to pass by copy or alias here, and that isn't encoded *anywhere* on the call stack. Damian
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to return ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to re... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able t... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be ab... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should b... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able t... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able t... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be ab... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should b... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should b... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be ab... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should b... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to return ... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to re... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able t... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be ab... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should b... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines sho... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be ab... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should b... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines sho... Chaim Frenkel