"David L. Nicol" wrote: > > I like very much a print() that returns the value of what you > printed rather than success. I am always needing to define > littly intermediate temporaries so I can insert debugging code > inside huge, tortuous expressions. I think this is an excellent idea independent of others and should probably be RFC'ed separately. Since it does not have dependencies on other RFC's and can be implemented separately, it should probably be in its own RFC. You should probably consider whether this is useful for warn, write, or other output functions as well. -Nate
- RFC 39 (v2) Perl should have a print operator Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 39 (v2) Perl should have a print operator Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 39 (v2) Perl should have a print oper... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 39 (v2) Perl should have a print ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 39 (v2) Perl should have a print oper... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 39 (v2) Perl should have a print ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 39 (v2) Perl should have a pr... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 39 (v2) Perl should have a print ... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 39 (v2) Perl should have a print operator David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 39 (v2) Perl should have a print oper... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 39 (v2) Perl should have a print ... David L. Nicol