On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 09:45:55AM -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote: > I don't know about this. Sounds cool, but I think we should stick to > something that somebody somewhere uses already. Of course, something > standard like 0 AD isn't bad. Standard for whom? I bet there are *millions* of Jews for whom "0 AD" is meaningless. s/Jews/<any other group of people who have their own calendar that predates christianity>/ -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modified Jul... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modifie... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Mod... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Mod... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modifie... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Mod... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Mod... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal tim... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal tim... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal tim... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal tim... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal tim... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal tim... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal tim... Tom Hughes
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal tim... Tim Bunce
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal tim... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modifie... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modifie... Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Mod... Russ Allbery