Re: RFC 130 (v1) Transaction-enabled variables for Perl6

[Nathan Wiger]

> We need  to get a  new keyword for defining  such a variable,  I think
> "transaction" is too  long, we could use "safe" for  this reason.

The proposal looks good. But isn't this more a language issue at this
point? Seems like we'll have to figure out the behavior we want first.

Also, "safe" is way too general and can be confused with tainting and
other data guarding methods. Since it's a transaction, why not "trans"?

-Nate