Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking

[raptor]

> > They behave similarly like &&, ||, and, or operator with one main
> > distinction they "backtrack" for example:
> >
> > { block1 } B<andthen> { block2 };
>
> This would be a good use of the to-be-liberated => operator:
>
>   { block1 } => { block2 };
>
> In any case, "andthen" doesn't seem like a good choice.
> Other possibilities:
> therefore
> implies
> segue
> seq
> so
]- any proposal for the name are welcome....they must be two.....  the
reason I decided to use this is cause it works like/is similar to ->
if-then-else, also look like and/or comparions operator.
The Prolog operators "," and ";" are already overused in perl.
THEN is not used by PERL, so here comes :

AND+THEN
OR+THEN

:")
=====
iVAN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=====