>>>>> "NW" == Nathan Wiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
NW> I agree. I think the trend should be to establish some permanent
NW> sublists, which we're informally leaning towards already. Something
NW> like:
NW> -io = ALL I/O issues, like open/socket/filehandles
NW> -subs = ALL sub/method/func issues, like lvalue subs
NW> -strict = ALL lexical/global variable scoping issues
NW> -objects = ALL OO and module issues
NW> -flow = ALL flow/threading issues
NW> -errors = ALL error handling issues
NW> -datetime = ALL date/time/etc issue
i see problems with overlapping areas. I/O callbacks fall under both io
and flow IMO. some of the error handling like dying deep in eval and
$SIG{DIE} also fall under error and flow.
but in any case why am i still seeing error stuff if i am not subscribed
to that list? people are not reading the relevent new list posts and
moving their email threads (the third overload of threads!) to the
proper list. i agree with skud, there is too much on the main language list.
uri
--
Uri Guttman --------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------- http://www.sysarch.com
SYStems ARCHitecture, Software Engineering, Perl, Internet, UNIX Consulting
The Perl Books Page ----------- http://www.sysarch.com/cgi-bin/perl_books
The Best Search Engine on the Net ---------- http://www.northernlight.com
