On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 01:16:26AM -0600, Tony Olekshy wrote: > try { } finally { } catch { } I don not see ht epoint of this ? IMO, it should be simple. try { } catch Class { } catch { } finally { } If try throws it is caught by the catch blocks finally is always run if any of the catch or finally throws, it is caught by a try {} block up the stack. Keep It Simple Graham.
- Towards a reasonable unwinding flow-control semantics. Tony Olekshy
- Re: Towards a reasonable unwinding flow-control s... Graham Barr
- Re: Towards a reasonable unwinding flow-contr... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Towards a reasonable unwinding flow-control s... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Towards a reasonable unwinding flow-contr... Graham Barr
- Re: Towards a reasonable unwinding flow-c... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Towards a reasonable unwinding fl... Peter Scott
- Re: Towards a reasonable unwindi... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Towards a reasonable unwinding flow-c... Tony Olekshy
- Re: Towards a reasonable unwinding flow-control s... Peter Scott
- Re: Towards a reasonable unwinding flow-contr... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Towards a reasonable unwinding flow-c... Peter Scott