Hi Robin Sure
join_field("subject.*"," "); join_field("subject","<br>"); The first join is for concatenating all the subfields. The second join is for all the field. In the new Catmandu version we are enhancing the language a bit, thats why I might have written my previous examples with the new syntax. Greetings from ELAG2014 in Bath! Patrick ________________________________________ From: Robin Sheat [ro...@catalyst.net.nz] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 4:58 AM To: perl4lib Subject: Re: Converting MARC fields with Catmandu - repeated subfields being squished together. Robin Sheat schreef op ma 09-06-2014 om 14:50 [+1200]: > $ cat test.fixes > marc_map('650','subject',join:'###'); > remove_field('record'); Ah, I found that I need to change the syntax a bit: marc_map('650','subject', -split => 1); gives me: {"subject":[["Counting","Pictorial works","Juvenile literature."],["English language","Alphabet","Pictorial works","Juvenile literature.","14467"],["Time","Pictorial works","Juvenile literature.","15531"],["Children's stories, English","Pictorial works."]],"_id":"5567128"} which is closer. Is there an easy way to flatten those arrays? Otherwise I can go with join and the split, but this way seems cleaner. Actually, I wonder if nested arrays would work even better for my purposes, I guess I should test it... -- Robin Sheat Catalyst IT Ltd. ✆ +64 4 803 2204 GPG: 5FA7 4B49 1E4D CAA4 4C38 8505 77F5 B724 F871 3BDF