Hi Andy,
Thanks for checking on that. I can confirm that the record has
E2 in it and that when I replace E2 with a ? character, new_from_xml()
doesn't croak.
I was able to find the E2 character in the code tables provided
by LOC (which I assume are what MARC::Charset uses). Here is what
they've got:
<code>
<isCombining>true</isCombining>
<marc>E2</marc>
<ucs>0301</ucs>
<utf-8>CC81</utf-8>
<name>ACUTE / COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT (Oxia)</name>
</code>
So is the utf-8 mapping above wrong? or is the MARC::Record suite
handling combining characters correctly?
Cheers,
--
Joshua Ferraro VENDOR SERVICES FOR OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE
President, Technology migration, training, maintenance, support
LibLime Featuring Koha Open-Source ILS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Full Demos at http://liblime.com/koha |1(888)KohaILS
