Edward Summers wrote:
On May 3, 2006, at 8:55 AM, Mark Jordan wrote:
I think it should mean "the zeroth occurrence of subfield 'u'", since
specifying which of a repeated group of subfields is a realistic task,
as you say. For example, each record has two 'u's but all of the first
ones are garbage.
Actually 'pos' as implemented will remove the subfield u if it is at
position n in the field. So we could have occurrence too. I feel like
I'm chasing windmills a bit. Do y'all really *need* all this
functionality in delete_subfield() :-) I guess you do or else you
wouldn't be so interested in asking for it.
Well, maybe this IS getting a little out of hand! I could live with the
old-fashioned way myself. Being a newbie to the list I was surprised how
fast you jumped in and provided the new functionality.
Mike
--
Michael Kreyche
Systems Librarian
Associate Professor
Kent State University Libraries and Media Services
http://www.personal.kent.edu/~mkreyche
330-672-1918
