David, Just quick followup. I don't have a particularly strong opinion about the namespace, and your argument makes sense. In any case, a search at cpan.org for either seems to find it.
Cheers, Brad On 1/6/06, David Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks for the comment, Brad. > > Yeah, I was wondering about that. My reasoning is that Tk has a number of > widgets, like Tk::Text for dealing with free-form text, or the > Tk::DBI::Table for playing with SQL... so an argument could be made that > Tk::MARC_Editor is a beast like that - a Tk widget specifically for > playing > with MARC records. > > On the other hand, MARC-record stuff *is* very... well, MARC-centric. > Perhaps it would fit better in the MARC namespace. > > Anyone else want to wade in? > > -David > > Brad said: > > > Hello, > > > > Perhaps I have a misconception, but the Tk:: namespace implies to me a > set > > of utility modules for use in Tk applications. It seems like this > > application might be better located in the MARC:: namespace. Something > like > > MARC::Tk::Editor? > > > > -- > > Brad > > > >
