On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 10:27:39PM -0500, Eric Lease Morgan wrote: > Since my original implementation is still the fastest, and the newer > implementations do not improve the speed of the application, then I must > assume that the process is slow because of the XSLT transformations > themselves. These transformations are straight-forward:
If you can provide me with the data files I would be willing to write a similar benchmark using XML::SAX :) //Ed
