Sisyphus wrote:

> Generally, imho, it is better to remove the "bugs" (used equally, if not
> more, loosely).
> 
> Maybe that's what the op wants to do .... or maybe he just wants to suppress
> those particular warnings. It's not entirely clear to me. If he wants to
> remove the "bugs" he'll take note of your advice on how to approach that,
> and if he simply wants to selectively suppress warnings then I hope that
> what I wrote is of assistance.

It seems to me that when you get a warning, you're doing something wrong
or it wasn't coded to take all possibilities into consideration - so I
never turn off warnings or strict. I already found two legit bugs in that
module, so I'm guessing there are more to find.

-- 
  ,-/-  __      _  _         $Bill Luebkert    Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (_/   /  )    // //       DBE Collectibles    Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  / ) /--<  o // //      Castle of Medieval Myth & Magic http://www.todbe.com/
-/-' /___/_<_</_</_    http://dbecoll.tripod.com/ (My Perl/Lakers stuff)
_______________________________________________
Perl-Win32-Users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs

Reply via email to