I'm curious as to why memory statistics seems to be very difficult to be
accurate about.  If you use kstats, mdb ::memstat, and add up VSZ/RSS
from ps, you get numbers that are different, although close.

Can anyone shed some light on why this is?  I'm assumed that ::memstat
is the most accurate measure and I'm comparing my numbers against it,
but perhaps it is not the best validation?

benr.
_______________________________________________
perf-discuss mailing list
perf-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to