I'm curious as to why memory statistics seems to be very difficult to be accurate about. If you use kstats, mdb ::memstat, and add up VSZ/RSS from ps, you get numbers that are different, although close.
Can anyone shed some light on why this is? I'm assumed that ::memstat is the most accurate measure and I'm comparing my numbers against it, but perhaps it is not the best validation? benr. _______________________________________________ perf-discuss mailing list perf-discuss@opensolaris.org