See Ravi Talashikar's blog for an explanation of CPU vs core
utilization on CMT architectures such as the T1000:
   http://blogs.sun.com/travi/entry/ultrasparc_t1_utilization_explained

- Steve

On 09/30/08 15:18, Elad Lahav wrote:
> I'm looking into the performance of a simple, single-threaded, TCP server on 
> a T1000.
> According to mpstat, the strand running the server is about 50% idle. 
> However, performance
> counters suggest that it is executing about 230 million instructions per 
> second, which,
> from my experience thus far, is pretty much the limit of a single-threaded 
> application.
> Roughly the same numbers are reported for the strand handling the interrupts 
> (the two are
> on different cores, so there is no competition for shared resources). The NIC 
> is reading
> at 700Mbps, so the network is not the bottleneck.
> 
> I'm having a hard time putting all of this information together, as there is 
> no clear
> bottleneck. Also, I think there is a more general issue here: how can one 
> interpret
> per-strand mpstat numbers, as the resources available to a strand change 
> dynamically with
> the load on a core?
> 
> --Elad
> 
> _______________________________________________
> perf-discuss mailing list
> perf-discuss@opensolaris.org

_______________________________________________
perf-discuss mailing list
perf-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to