On Jun 3, 2008, at 9:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 03:32:47PM -0700, eric kustarz wrote: >> >> On May 29, 2008, at 11:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> [...] >>> >>> I remember another hardware arrays (yes, two arrays) test where >>> vdbench shows >>> that one array is a bit faster (more IOPS) then the other. While >>> filebench (which tries to simulate the real workloads) shows that >>> that >>> the other aray is slightly faster. What is true ? I don't know. >>> But I >>> wouldn't like to use just one tool. Both has its advantages and >>> disadvantages. And _both_ give much wider picture of how the storage >>> behaves in particular workload. >> >> So that's disturbing. What workload were you running? > > OLTP
Interesting, what version of vdbench did you run? How did you run a OLTP workload with vdbench? What version of FileBench and what version of oltp.f did you run? eric _______________________________________________ perf-discuss mailing list perf-discuss@opensolaris.org
