Hi Drew,
FileBench is running on Thumper box.
Thanks,
Pavel
# zpool status
pool: pool0
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
pool0 ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c8t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c8t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c8t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c8t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c8t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c8t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c8t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c8t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
spares
c5t0d0 AVAIL
Andrew Wilson wrote:
> Pavel,
> It was supposed to only use 32. Thanks for reporting this. I'll look
> into that for you and try to get it fixed. Just out of curiosity, are
> you running this on a machine with some sort of RAIDed disk drives. If
> you only have one drive the paralloc doesn't seem to really help
> anyway, as the single disk is the bottleneck.
>
> Drew
>
> Pavel Filipensky wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am running Filebench 1.2.4 on s10 x86. I have set the fileset to
>> contain 1.000.000 files, with options prealloc=100,reuse,paralloc.
>> During creation phase, I see that the go_filebench process is not
>> destroying threads - so far there is almost million lwps:
>>
>>
>> # ps -L -p 2746|wc -l
>> 741525
>>
>>
>> # ps -L -p 2746|head
>> PID LWP TTY LTIME CMD
>> 2746 1 pts/1 4:03 go_fileb
>> 2746 2 pts/1 0:01 go_fileb
>> 2746 3 pts/1 0:00 <defunct>
>> 2746 4 pts/1 0:00 <defunct>
>> 2746 5 pts/1 0:00 <defunct>
>> 2746 6 pts/1 0:00 <defunct>
>> 2746 7 pts/1 0:00 <defunct>
>> 2746 8 pts/1 0:00 <defunct>
>> 2746 9 pts/1 0:00 <defunct>
>>
>> # ps -L -p 2746|tail
>> 2746 741473 pts/1 0:00 <defunct>
>> 2746 741474 pts/1 0:00 go_fileb
>> 2746 741475 pts/1 0:00 go_fileb
>> 2746 741476 pts/1 0:00 go_fileb
>> 2746 741477 pts/1 0:00 go_fileb
>> 2746 741478 pts/1 0:00 go_fileb
>> 2746 741479 pts/1 0:00 go_fileb
>> 2746 741480 pts/1 0:00 go_fileb
>> 2746 741481 pts/1 0:00 go_fileb
>> 2746 741482 pts/1 0:00 go_fileb
>>
>> Can this be fixed to save the resources?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Pavel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> perf-discuss mailing list
>> perf-discuss@opensolaris.org
>>
>
_______________________________________________
perf-discuss mailing list
perf-discuss@opensolaris.org
