Grab the 1.0-linux tarball -- I don't think all the Linux changes have been cross-ported into 1.1 yet...
Richard On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 06:43:13AM -0700, Christian Fritze wrote: > Hello everybody! > > I would like to try filebench on SLES 10 SP1 (2.6.16.46-0.12-smp SMP x86_64) > and > Debian 'etch' (2.6.18-6-amd64 SMP x86_64) but don't seem to see much light > yet: > > First I tried version 1.1.1, configure runs fine but compilation fails > complaining > about missing procfs.h, missing int_limits.h on both systems. I do have a > procfs.h > in /usr/include/sys but apparently it isn't seen. Handcrafting more '-I's > into the > Makefile didn't help here. > > After this I downloaded the 1.1.0-linux package from sourceforge. This seems > to compile and install more or less correctly but when I try to run a test > using > runbench I get the error message > "sh: NONE/filebench/scripts/filebench_compare: No such file or directory" > for each configuration in profile file mybench.prof. Seems as if it doesn't > recognize its install prefix (no matter wether I state /usr/local explicitly > during configure or not) > > Now I tried to run filebench interactively using go_filebench. I loaded > varmail, > set the directory to test and then got the error message > "11272: 61.161: procflow exec proc failed: No such file or directory on line > 54 > 11272: 62.164: Could not start run on line 54" > after having created the fileset "bigfileset" successfully as it seems. > > Hmm, is there any howto out there yet enabling one to get filebench running > reliably under linux? > > greetings > Christian > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > perf-discuss mailing list > perf-discuss@opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ perf-discuss mailing list perf-discuss@opensolaris.org
