Thank you Richard. I am kind of new to filebench. Would it be okay if I asked how long it usually takes to get it ready for Linux?
Regards, John G ----- Original Message ---- From: Richard McDougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: John Vijoe George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: perf-discuss@opensolaris.org Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:23:16 AM Subject: Re: [perf-discuss] procflow exec proc failed: Permission denied on line 64 Great! Yes, there was a known issue with some workload - doing repeat runs may require exiting and calling into the interpreter again. I believe this is fixed in the new source release, which is being tidied up for Linux... Richard. On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 07:06:03AM -0700, John Vijoe George wrote: > > > You might need to install filebench explicitly in /usr/local/filebench > > on Linux to avoid this error... > That is where it got installed when I ran the make install command. > > > Richard. > John G > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 03:13:41PM -0700, John Vijoe George wrote: > > Hi, > > I am trying to get filebench to run on my Linux ( RHEL 5 ) machine - > 2.6.18-8.el5. I managed to install filebench-1.64 successfully, but > when I try to run it, I get the following errors: > > > > filebench> load varmail > > 16683: 5.618: Varmail Version 1.24 2005/06/22 08:08:30 personality > successfully loaded > > 16683: 5.618: Usage: set $dir=<dir> > > 16683: 5.618: set $filesize=<size> defaults to 16384 > > 16683: 5.618: set $nfiles=<value> defaults to 1000 > > 16683: 5.618: set $nthreads=<value> defaults to 16 > > 16683: 5.618: set $meaniosize=<value> defaults to 16384 > > 16683: 5.618: set $meandirwidth=<size> defaults to 1000000 > > 16683: 5.618: (sets mean dir width and dir depth is calculated as log > (width, nfiles) > > 16683: 5.618: dirdepth therefore defaults to dir depth of 1 as in > postmark > > 16683: 5.618: set $meandir lower to increase depth beyond 1 if > desired) > > 16683: 5.618: > > 16683: 5.618: run runtime (e.g. run 60) > > 16683: 5.618: syntax error, token expected on line 51 > > filebench> run 10 > > 16683: 7.826: Fileset bigfileset: 1000 files, avg dir = 1000000.0, > avg depth = 0.5, mbytes=16 > > 16683: 7.843: Removed any existing fileset bigfileset in 1 seconds > > 16683: 7.843: Creating fileset bigfileset... > > 16683: 7.891: Preallocated 805 of 1000 of fileset bigfileset in 1 > seconds > > 16683: 7.891: Creating/pre-allocating files > > 16683: 7.891: Starting 1 filereader instances > > 16683: 7.891: procflow exec proc failed: Permission denied on line 52 > > 16683: 32.905: Waiting for process filereader-1 16686 > > 16683: 35.906: Waiting for process filereader-1 16686 > > 16683: 38.908: Failed to start process filereader-1 > > 16683: 38.908: Running... > > 16683: 39.911: Run took 1 seconds... > > 16683: 39.912: Per-Operation Breakdown > > closefile4 0ops/s 0.0mb/s 0.0ms/op > 0us/op-cpu > > readfile4 0ops/s 0.0mb/s 0.0ms/op > 0us/op-cpu > > openfile4 0ops/s 0.0mb/s 0.0ms/op > 0us/op-cpu > > closefile3 0ops/s 0.0mb/s 0.0ms/op > 0us/op-cpu > > fsyncfile3 0ops/s 0.0mb/s 0.0ms/op > 0us/op-cpu > > appendfilerand3 0ops/s 0.0mb/s 0.0ms/op > 0us/op-cpu > > readfile3 0ops/s 0.0mb/s 0.0ms/op > 0us/op-cpu > > openfile3 0ops/s 0.0mb/s 0.0ms/op > 0us/op-cpu > > closefile2 0ops/s 0.0mb/s 0.0ms/op > 0us/op-cpu > > fsyncfile2 0ops/s 0.0mb/s 0.0ms/op > 0us/op-cpu > > appendfilerand2 0ops/s 0.0mb/s 0.0ms/op > 0us/op-cpu > > createfile2 0ops/s 0.0mb/s 0.0ms/op > 0us/op-cpu > > deletefile1 0ops/s 0.0mb/s 0.0ms/op > 0us/op-cpu > > > > 16683: 39.912: > > IO Summary: 0 ops 0.0 ops/s, (0/0 r/w) 0.0mb/s, 0us > cpu/op, 0.0ms latency > > 16683: 39.912: Shutting down processes > > > > > > > > i have no idea as to why this is happening. Any input is appreciated. > > > > Regards, > > John G > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > > perf-discuss mailing list > > perf-discuss@opensolaris.org > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ perf-discuss mailing list perf-discuss@opensolaris.org
