Alexander Kolbasov wrote: >> I'd like to modify my initial proposal and suggest to create a "CPU >> Observability" project with the goal of providing good abstraction and >> tools for CPU-related observability. >> >> As for the exact mechanism being used - the filesystem, programmatic >> API, kstat extensions or some combination of these - it can be explored >> by project participants. >> > > So are there any objections for creation of the CPU observability project? I > think both performance and observability communities are a good home for it. > Any strong preferences here? >
I believe you have endorsement from the performance community. Any objections? -Eric _______________________________________________ perf-discuss mailing list perf-discuss@opensolaris.org
