On Thu 11 Aug 2005 at 11:56AM, Eric Saxe wrote: > > This might sound dumb, but are we sure that processes are the resource > > which is temporarily unavailable? > > I think what you are saying, Dan, is that "this might be so obvious that > it has escaped you", and you very well might be right. :)
The reason I ask is IIRC these were test cases about file locks: > ... > Running: c_lockf_10 for 0.50919 seconds > Running: c_lockf_200fork: Resource temporarily unavailable > Running: c_flockfork: Resource temporarily unavailable > Running: c_flock_10fork: Resource temporarily unavailable > Running: c_flock_200fork: Resource temporarily unavailable > Running: c_fcntl_1fork: Resource temporarily unavailable > Running: c_fcntl_10fork: Resource temporarily unavailable > Running: c_fcntl_200fork: Resource temporarily unavailable I recently had a discussion with Devon O'Dell about how MacOS has limited the number of these that the OS is willing to create. Based on that conversation I opened an RFE: 6293764 RFE: resource control governing file range locking http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6293764 Thanks, -dp -- Daniel Price - Solaris Kernel Engineering - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - blogs.sun.com/dp _______________________________________________ perf-discuss mailing list perf-discuss@opensolaris.org
