William Robb wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Christopher Lillja > Subject: Re: Of Prime Importance > > > > > I'll take a GREAT sample of a lowly 85/2 over a mediocre > sample of a > > precious 77/1.8 ltd. any day. I think the only way to get a > great > > collection of Pentax primes is to buy 'em, test 'em in the > real world, > > and dump 'em if they don't do it for you. Not all of them are > gems, and > > conventional wisdom isn't. > > Is there such a thing as a mediocre 77mm? I know P�l had a > defective sample, but thats not quite the same thing. > I don't know if I have a good, bad or indifferent M85mm f/2. I > do know that I was surprised that it isn't regarded as a > particularly good lens.
Which? The 77 or the 85? > William Robb keith whaley
