How about two-legged pets? Len ---
> -----Original Message----- > From: frank theriault [mailto:knarf.theriault@;sympatico.ca] > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Have we ever done people's pets on PUG? > > > I hear ya, but it doesn't have to be the photographer's pet. > I don't know about other places, but around here, you can't > walk down the street without seeing someone walking a dog, > cat (really!), ferret, parrot or whatever. Surely that would > give rise to plenty of photo ops for those who don't wait > hand and foot on an animal in their home. You could do your > pet (how bad does that sound? <vbg>) or someone else's... > > regards, > frank > > William Robb wrote: > > > > > > > This is only meant to be a semi serious objection, but.... > The PUG, as > > I understand it is to be as inclusive as possible, within > the scope of > > it being a Pentax equipment website. I recall a few ideas > being shot > > down for the PUG due to the lack of inclusivity. > > A pets gallery may fall under that umbrella. > > We don't all have a pet. > > > > William Robb > > -- > "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. > The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer > > >
