----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "PDML (Pentax)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: Re:To the pentax spies


> While this fellow was posting this to the list, he was sending the
attached
> email to me. He is who he is. His spots won't change. We're just going to
> have to endure him for a while just as we had to endure "The Who" and
> "Mafud".
>
> Regards,
> Bob...
>
> From: "Brad Dobo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> > Once again, am I going to need a form letter?  What is the point of this
> > Cotty?  You think that you unsubscribing will punish me?  You actually
> just
> > threatened me.  That's not very acceptable behaviour.  I'd in fact say
> > threatening someone is worse than swearing on the board!  Before this
> email,
> > you wrote another one to me telling me to keep my opinions to myself,
> simply
> > because you did not agree with them.  Of course it was ok for you to
post
> > your opinion.  What is with the attitude?  Relax a bit.
> >
> > For the rest of the list members:  Why did I bother with the apology?
I'd
> > really like someone to actually tell me on the board.  Seems no one has
> read
> > the apologies 10^2 I have posted or other peoples similar response, as I
> am
> > still getting mailings about it.  Why repeat it?  What will Cotty gain
> from
> > sending this?  Is it a hatred of me?  Is threatening to quit an attempt
to
> > get the long-time members against me as well?  Does anyone have an
answer?
> > Please all valid questions I hope you can all answer, especially the
'Why
> > did I bother with the apology?'
> >
> > Can a few of you send this to Cotty or the board again so Cotty can read
> it?
> > I really don't know why he hates me for not wanting to hear 1000000
times
> > the same thing about a DSLR or the fact I don't see one coming or don't
> want
> > one.  Sure I can ask to stop with the DSLR stuff can't it?  It's what I
> > think, it's an opinion, and of course, the biggest thing is no one is
> forced
> > to do what I say.
> >
> > Man, I hate to send these messages time after time after time.  Does the
> > group want to focus on me despite what I say?  Do I keep the kid who
> swears
> > loudly in class inside and miss recesses for that day?  I fit it
fitting.
> > Do I want them writing the WHOLE dictionary as punishment, instead of
> > writing out 3 pages of the letter L in the dictionary? No, 3 pages of L
is
> a
> > lot and a fitting punishment.   Do I request suspension for the child
from
> > the principal?  Of course not.
> >
> > Does anyone understand this?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Brad Dobo
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Pentax List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:49 AM
> > Subject: Re:To the pentax spies
> >
> >
> > > >HEY PENTAX (expletive deleted), YOU READING THIS?  SHOW YOURSELF TO
> THIS
> > > GROUP >>AND TELL
> > > >US WHY WE ALL USE PENTAX EVEN THOUGH IT SUCKS!  TELL US A TALE ABOUT
A
> > > >DIGITAL SLR!
> > >
> > > Brad,
> > >
> > > If you use language like this again, I will consider unsubscribing,
> which
> > > will be a shame. I have been reading and contributing to this list for
a
> > > while now, and I have seldom seen such language used. I am not a
prude,
> > > and have been known to blaspheme, but doing it in public on an email
> list
> > > is uncalled for.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately for me I get the digest version of the list, so I cannot
> > > delete your emails. I will not be reading any more of them.
> > >
> > > Apologies for being civilised,
>

Reply via email to