And also not surprising to see big electronic companies, like Sony, trying to convince us that film is dead.
DG At 01:11 PM 10/1/02 -0400, you wrote: >This is one report by a non photographer. The information is therefore >anecdotal in nature. If you are looking for meaningful information on a >trend, then you would have to see some data derived from a survey. >Now, unless the photographer is referring to multiple scan MF type studio >camera, there is no need to download images after every shot, because they >are stored in the camera. You can buy DSLRs that work at over 5 fps. It's >not surprising to see, "Film is Good" articles in a Rochester newspaper. > >From: "Peifer, William [OCDUS]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >... He finds that the >time it takes to transfer images from camera to computer (15 to 20 seconds, >according to the article) is "too slow",...
