Mark, FWIW, my local lab owner here said that from his experience, PMA shows are bigger and more important for product announcements than Photokina. I guess frequency is one reason. A show every two years doesn't make for as good a venue as a show every year. Perhaps Pentax and Nikon have plans for the PMA.
Bruce Tuesday, October 1, 2002, 6:09:25 AM, you wrote: MR> "Steve Desjardins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>You know, I hate to start speculation all over agin, but the fact that >>they didn't release anything might indiciate that they just chose to >>skip this show, no matter how big it is. It's hard to belieive that >>they have develped nothing at all, including P&S. MR> It's certainly odd. It's possibly even weirder that Nikon didn't show anything. MR> Anyone on any Nikon mailing lists? I'd expect they're wondering why Nikon didn't MR> announce a full-frame digital SLR, especially after Canon and Kodak (with a MR> Nikon lens mount) did. What's the speculation from the Nikon fanatics out there? MR> I was also amazed and disappointed to get nothing new from Fuji. The ISO 100 MR> Velvia was widely anticipated (and, frankly, would have been a lot more useful MR> to me than a Pentax digital SLR). MR> Curiouser and curiouser.
