Hi, Lukasz, I agree.
I've handled a Voigtlander, and I found it plasticky feeling as well, most likely because the body's skin is made of plastic <g>. It is noisy (your comparison to an MX is about right), and vibrates more than I'd like. My Leica CL (which isn't as quiet and vibration-free as an M6) is better than the Voigtlander in both regards. For what they're asking for one here in Canada, it didn't seem worth the money, for a new body. FWIW... regards, frank �ukasz Kacperczyk wrote: > >From my non-user experience and these rare occasions I handled the camera (a > few R's) - very nice viewfinder, very plasticky feel, terrible shutter. As > loud as my MX, and causing as much vibration as an SLR. This disqualifies it > as a rangefinder camera for me. A rangefinder is supposed to be quiet, and > vibationless so that the shooter could handhold it at slow speeds. I must > say that at first I was very enthusiastic towards the camera, but from the > first (but not the last - I thought maybe it was the particular specimen I > handled) time I took in my hands I was VERY dissapointed. > -- "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
