Unlikely as one mans best features are another's worst features.
At 06:43 AM 8/20/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>No, you are not the only one, Artur. I've been very happy using my PZ-1p.
>I won't buy a replacement for it until the replacement actually improves
>significantly. So far, the MZ-S hasn't done that. Perhaps the MZ-Sn but
>the modifications may not be enough. A completely new top model could
>convince me, if it combined all of the best features of the LX, PZ-1p, and
>MZ-S.
>
>Len
>---
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Artur Led�chowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 1:56 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Re: Odp: Next Pentax Flagship Camera?
>
>
>Alan Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Different opinions are expected, as always, just don't take it personal. :)
>
>Sometimes it's very hard not to take it personal.
>I wonder if I'm really the only one PDML'er who thinks that Z-1p is user
>friendly and easy to master, the only one who feels that MZ-S is not as good
>as it could and should have been. I wonder if all those loads of user's good
>opinions on Z-1p written on the Photography Review, Camera Review, PhotoZone
>and the similar sites are worth nothing.
>Regards
>Artur
>-
>-
>This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
>go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
>visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
