mike wilson wrote:
> The problem with the camera from the POV of the PDML isn't the camera,
> it's that we are all too fucking old. The target market isn't a bunch
> of people in God's waiting room.
We are both talking about the camera that uses a way outdated and very
expensive imaging technology, aren't we? In which case, anyone buying a
superfluous and expensive unit when there are arguably better and certainly
substantially cheaper options seems to be a few frames short of a roll.
____________________________________________________________________
I've still got Pentax film cameras if I want to play with film. The thing I
don't want to have is more to scan to use digitally. I already have thousands
of slides still to scan + my late father's negatives to do. Photography should
be fun, not another job on the 'to-do' list.
Malcolm
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
