Alan C -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
All teleconverters degrade the image to some extent, 2x more than 1.4x.
In film & 6Mp days cropping wasn't really an option so they did give
more reach without the expense of a longer lens. Long ago I had an M42
Vivitar 2x which made my SuperTak 55/2 a useful 110/4. Given a high
quality TC and a fast host lens, good results are possible. However with
the high Mp sensors now in common use, a cropped image without the TC
may be just as good or even better so what is the point? Only perhaps
cropping options of the TC image which starts with full Mp?
- Are Teleconverters a Con? Alan C
- Re: Are Teleconverters a Con? P. J. Alling
- Re: Are Teleconverters a Con? Paul Stenquist
- Re: Are Teleconverters a Con? Alan C
- Re: Are Teleconverters a Con? John Francis
- Re: Are Teleconverters a Con? Godfrey DiGiorgi
- Re: Are Teleconverters a Con? Paul Stenquist

