Bruce tossed out for our perusal ....
 
> An excerpt from, THE REVOLUTION IN PHOTO MARKETING, PART
> II - The Darker View, from: ... digitaljournalist.org
 
        What else would one expect from an outfit that is riding
        the digital wave? Anything remotely affecting film in a 
        negative (punny, huh?) way is surely "news" to them. Just
        more fodder to lure people over to the digital "darker view",
        IMHO.

        Digital will eventually meet film on terms other than the
        immediacy of results and speed/ease of manipulation, etc -
        but it will be even longer still before the entire imaging
        scene is "digitized" on both the source & end result fronts.
        The amount/cost of the peripherial equipment for quality
        digital is still pretty steep for all but the biggest media
        businesses. I know that the smaller shops certainly can't
        justify full digital set-up - and if they try on their
        operating budgets, they end up little better than a Kinko's
        type copy shop. The average image customer is still better
        off purchasing rights to a good medium format (or even 35mm)
        transparancy and having their 4-color print shop do the
        digitalization on high-end equipment. There are a few places
        here that flaunt digital - but none even have dedicated film
        scanners - let alone ability to deal w/ 120 transparancies
        other than old flatbed transparancy adapter machines. None
        even have invested in a decent inkjet printer along the lines
        of the set-up that Aaron has going - all using "consumer"
        printers and I would suspect that many PDML members actually
        own better systems for their personal use than these shops.
        They're just riding the wave and selling hula hoops to the masses.

        A high-rez film scan of a 6x7 transparancy will "out-pixel"
        any straight from camera digital file for quite some time to 
        come - I would suspect.

        Don't get me wrong - digital has its uses and will become
        adequate for more as time goes by - but it isn't the end
        for quality imaging from film technology just yet.

        ... just my thoughts from the hinterlands of the small market

        Bill

        ---------------------------------------------------------
        Bill D. Casselberry ; Photography on the Oregon Coast

                                http://www.orednet.org/~bcasselb
                                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        ---------------------------------------------------------
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to