----- Original Message -----
From: William Kane
Subject: DSLR building

I would start with a working Nikon DSLR, beat it to death with
my  PENTAX 6x7, and then go and take some pictures with the 6x7.
But I have just had recent digital camera experience......

William Robb



> Hey gang,
>
>    I was thinking recently about making a cheap attempt at
building a
> DSLR using a pentax body and parts from a working digital
camera.  I
> know that this is an exercise in futility, as it would be more
> exspensive/work intensive to do, than to just buy a decent
digital
> camera . . . but, I guess that is the Pentax Way . . . (or at
least what
> they are indicating to their consumers).
>
>    My current thoughts on the topic:
>
>    I would start out with a cheaper digital camera.  I haven't
selected
> one yet, but I'm thinking it would be best to take one of the
smaller
> N***N cameras.  Basically, the plan includes taking the camera
apart,
> and jury-rigging a Pentax SLR body to accept the necessary
parts.
>
>    A back can be modified to hold the CCD and the necessary
LCD panels.
> The mechanics of the camera can be removed to make room for
necessary
> electronics, as well as the two compartments that would
normally hold
> film.
>
>    There would be a problem with getting the shutter and CCD
to synch at
> the appropriate times.  My fix for this would to be to totally
remove
> the shutter curtain (digitals lack this anyhow).  This would
leave only
> the need to synch the mirror and CCD.  My solution to this?
Well, I
> know that some other camera manufacturers had modified bodies
that the
> mirror didn't actually flip.  The mirror was partially
silvered, and
> reflected approximatly 50% of the light to the prisim, while
the other
> 50% of the light moved through the mirror and into the film
plane
> (what's this type of mirror called again?) . . . There would
likely be a
> need to add an optic assembly in place of the shutter in order
for focus
> to work right . . .
>
>    This setup should allow for all the necessary electronics
to be taken
> up by just the digital electronics.  The prisim would be fully
> functional.  If need be a battery pack add-on could be used to
run the
> electronics using a dead battery.  The camera back would have
most of
> the necessary buttons associated with the digital camera.
>
>    I think that covers most of the issues.  Anyone see
anythign else
> that might need to be addressed?
>
> Il Bill
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To
unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to