HAR!
People with K-{1,3,5} are overqualified for that job! ;-)
BTW, regarding using their own gear:
There could be an interesting twist if the photographers are using their
own gear, especially if they are getting 1099 tax form, and not W-2 (which
might be the case, especially it sounds like a seasonal job, according to
the reviewer on Glassdoor). In that case, the photographer might not be
considered "an employee" but "an independent contractor".
If that's the case, then the copyright on the photos belongs to the
photographer, not to the studio, unless it is explicitly written
differently in the contract. I would assume, that they have written that
in the contract. It doesn't matter to me as a customer, it's just a
curious aspect of the copyright laws.
Cheers,
Igor
Larry Colen Wed, 21 Feb 2018 06:42:36 -0800 wrote:
Igor PDML-StR wrote:
PS. And one more question:
As Larry concluded as well, - it looks like the photographer used an
on-camera flash, most likely direct one (not bounced).
So, is it unreasonable to expect something like a couple of umbrella or
soft-box lights for this type of photographs?
If they are using their own gear, being paid $15/hour and/or don't know
much about photography, they might think that they are doing well to buy
themselves a speedlight for their cannon rebel.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
