But the lawyers would insist that they call it a "supplemental air bag system." And it would have to be accompanied by a warning to "wear your seat belt."
Alin Flaider wrote: > > 5 more posts on this thread and Pentax might consider building > airbags into their lenses. :o/ > > Servus, Alin > > Chris wrote: > > CB> I think he's got a valid question, though. Even though we may not know > CB> the answer, certain types of materials will be better at withstanding > CB> certain types of falls. There must be a materials engineer on the list > CB> who can take a stab at it. I'm curious to know which material would > CB> protect a lens better in an almost vertical fall, at a mid-range 45 degree > CB> angle or so, or almost flat. There's probably no One Right Solution, but > CB> if it turns out that, say, metal provides better impact absorption at any > CB> angle of impact from, say, 10 degrees to 70 degrees, it would be nice to > CB> know that. > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
