JC, I like the brighter 2nd version, too. Overall depth is much better to my eye. Have you tried 35mm yet? I've been hearing mixed reviews of this scanner, and have considered getting it. BTW, the Collins book is top-notch. Cheers, Bob --- "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Subject: epson 2450 neg scan > > > > > > What do you think of this scan? > > I used my newly acquired epson 2450 flatbed > > scanning the TMAX 400 67 neg at 600 dpi. > > http://www.gate.net/~hifisapi/inletepsonneg.jpg > > > > Not bad for a flatbed. I like the way no > > grain or noise shows up in the sky area. > > I did have to crank up the contrast to get > > a decent histogram. > > > Or look at this one, I think i got it even better. > Added just a toch more contrast and brightened > it hair. > What do you think? > http://www.gate.net/~hifisapi/inletepsonneg2.jpg > > JCO > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. > To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. > Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at > http://pug.komkon.org . >
===== What boots up must come down. Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
