Paul,
I recall your mentioning not having done any sharpening to the 150-450 examples 
you posted.
I think that some moderate sharpening certainly and even a tad of ERC "clarify" 
would be
reasonable and more realistic. 
I believe it's intended that digital images be sharpened.

J

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Stenquist" <[email protected]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 1:03:01 PM
Subject: DFA 150-450, first impression

The 150-450 zoom arrived today. It’s dark and gloomy in Michigan and raining 
intermittently, so I resisted the urge to go looking for birds and instead set 
the fine focus adjustment, then took a couple of sample pics. My tests showed 
the lens was back focusing a bit, and a +4 setting brought it right in 
throughout the range. It’s built like a tank, there’s no wobble or looseness, 
and the zoom is as tight as any lens i’ve ever owned. (One reviewer mentioned 
zoom creep. If that ever was a problem, it’s definitely been resolved. You have 
to expend a fair amount of effort to change the focal length.) I shot some dead 
ferns off a tripod at 450mm, ISO 3200, f5.6, 1/60th. 

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18141845&size=lg

Here’s a 100% crop of the area where I placed the focal point 

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18141846&size=lg

Very pleased thus far. Can’t wait to try it out on some birdies.

Paul
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to