A thread like this is the conversational equivalent of everyone
marching in wearing their overshoes and opening their raincoats to
reveal that they are wearing nothing underneath. It's not a pretty
sight.

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:57 PM, knarf <[email protected]> wrote:
> "They called themselves Communists."
>
> The former East Germany called themselves the German Democratic Republic. 
> What's in a name?
>
> "Lenin was the orthodox Marxist."
>
> At the risk of oversimplification, Lenin was about the Party, and 
> centralizing power. I suspect he may have considered that a necessary interim 
> measure but he did that. There's a reason they called it "Marxist-Leninist"; 
> he changed marxism .
>
> "Mao was an orthodox Marxist."
>
> He was just an evil totalitarian dictator. He used Marxist-Leninist jargon 
> and catch words but he was basically a Stalinist.
>
> "Stalin maintained Lenin's system."
>
> See Mao. I mean, he basically wrested power from Lenin (Trotsky was the heir 
> apparent) and turned the USSR into a full-on State-Capitalist economy. He was 
> an evil dictator. He was all about power. He turned himself into a god, a 
> cult leader to be worshipped and adored. There was nothing of a communist 
> about him.
>
> Look, I said earlier that there's never been a communist state. And I don't 
> think there ever will be one. I think that one of the downfalls (perhaps the 
> biggest one) of communism is that it almost necessarily devolves into a 
> dictatorship, with a single-party, totalitarian government led by a 
> megalomaniac who tries to turn himself into a god.
>
> It's happened enough times, hasn't it?
>
> I'm a lefty but I'm no commie. Nice concept, nice theory but it'll never fly. 
> The vacuum left during or after the revolution will always leave the opening 
> for the above to occur. Always.
>
> But whatever criticisms you have of the evil regimes you mention, they're 
> evil for reasons other than their putative communism.
>
> Cheers,
>
> frank
>
>
>
> On November 17, 2015 2:50:01 PM EST, Collin B <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>There has never been a communist state. After the Revolution the USSR
>>may
>>have been moving that way but never got there. However close they may
>>(or
>>may not have) come,
>>>they were completely derailed by Stalin.
>>>
>>>The USSR and every other so-called communist state were actually
>>State-Capitalists. That is they were in fact capitalist however the
>>means of
>>production were owned by
>>>the state rather than individuals or corporations (who are, as we all
>>know,
>>legal persons).
>>>
>>>So whatever happened to the USSR and the Warsaw Pact states, it wasn't
>>happening to commies.
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>
>>>frank
>>
>>In the West we like to over-simplify or idealize communism as some sort
>>of
>>communalism.
>>Nothing could be further from the truth, John Lennon not being excused
>>for
>>his "imagination."
>>
>>They called themselves Communists.  Lenin was the orthodox Marxist.
>>Mao was an orthodox Marxist.  Stalin maintained Lenin's system.
>>Stalin killed 60M.  Mao, at least 30M.  Hitler, 10M+
>>Those three killed about 1/20 of the world population of the mid 20th
>>c.
>>Communism is about power.  It was never about a touchy-feely community.
>>
>>Reading Marx' "Capital" he did not entirely oppose the existence of
>>capital
>>but the system under which it was managed.
>>
>>
>>We just don't learn from history.  Malthus was foundational to Marx.
>>Though his predictions have failed on numerous occasions they are still
>>being proposed as workable (eg, Sanger & the modern green movement).
>>Lenin just couldn't make things work.  (To his credit, though, he did
>>clamp
>>down on organized crime.)
>>Look at PROC & Cuba? They survive because the feed off capitalism, just
>>as
>>do other forms of socialism.
>>N. Korea, on the other hand, presents the world something much closer
>>to
>>Stalin's USSR.
>
> --
>
> "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -- Henri Cartier-Bresson
>
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.



-- 
Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to